Skip to article
pupIDKnowledge
Center

Research, made readable

Why there’s no single normal birthweight for puppies

A number on the scale needs a little company: the breed, the litter, the puppy’s age—and a clear idea of what you’re comparing.

Explore the breed data
A woman writes beside a white whelping box while a yellow Labrador lies with five tiny puppies on blue bedding.
A weight belongs to one puppy, in one litter, at one moment.

If you’ve ever searched for a “normal puppy birthweight,” you’ve probably found a very tidy answer to a rather untidy question.

Dogs arrive in very different sizes. A useful comparison needs to say which puppies it describes. And even a carefully measured weight can’t, by itself, tell you whether an individual newborn is doing well.

This is a closer look at what published birthweight data can tell you—and what the numbers leave for your veterinarian to assess.

Start with the population

One species. Very different starting weights.

In a French study of 6,694 live-born puppies, breed medians ranged from 118 g for Chihuahuas to 640 g for Newfoundlands. Those are the middle values in the recorded groups, not suggested birthweights. Mugnier et al., 2019 ↗

FIGURE 01

Where birthweights fell in 27 breeds

Dot = median · Band = Q1 to Q3, the middle half of recorded weights

Other size groups Breeds classified as giant in this study

Sorted breed birthweight chart: medians range from Chihuahua 118 grams to Newfoundland 640 grams. Each band shows the interquartile range, with puppy counts beside breed names. Full values follow in the data table.
Original plot from Mugnier et al. (2019), Table 1. Voluntary records from 75 French kennels, 1,202 litters and 27 pure breeds; births 1994–2017. Each n counts puppies. Bands show variation within the sample, not uncertainty around the median or a healthy range.
Read all 27 breeds as a data table
Birthweight summaries for all 27 breeds · Mugnier et al., Table 1
BreedPuppies (n)Q1 (g)Median (g)Q3 (g)
Chihuahua157102118133
Yorkshire Terrier128120140164.25
Pomeranian117130150166
Maltese178140.5165187
Shih Tzu225158172190
Bichon Frise107162183212.5
Dachshund152163.75184203.5
Coton de Tulear159165190210
Lhasa Apso153165190216
West Highland White Terrier164176.75200224.25
Jack Russell Terrier122185205.5225
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel155202230250
French Bulldog111210240266
Cocker Spaniel477223270310
Beagle124280310342.7
English Bulldog123262310370
Australian Shepherd420315365.5410
Golden Retriever483350400438.5
Labrador Retriever1846363.2410460
Rottweiler111370410447.5
Boxer123415470520
White Swiss Shepherd114420472.5520
Bernese Mountain dog265445480555
German Shepherd197436500570
Leonberger216450520581.25
Alaskan Malamute104500580631
Newfoundland163570640688
↓ Download the exact chart values (CSV)
Two hands support a tiny pale Labrador puppy horizontally just above the blue bedding.
Small details matter. So does choosing the right comparison.

Look a little closer

“Giant breed” still isn’t a birthweight.

Adult-size labels are broad buckets. In this study’s giant group, the Rottweiler median was 410 g; the Newfoundland median was 640 g. The bands below also overlap. Sharing a category doesn’t make the distributions identical. Tables 1 & 2 ↗

You can use a breed label to ask a better question. You can’t use it to finish the assessment.

FIGURE 02

Four breeds, one adult-size group

Same zero-based scale. Labels mark Q1, median and Q3.

Rottweiler: 370, 410, 447.5 grams; Bernese Mountain dog: 445, 480, 555; Leonberger: 450, 520, 581.25; Newfoundland: 570, 640, 688. Values are Q1, median and Q3.
Original comparison from Mugnier et al., Table 1; “giant” follows the paper’s Table 2 classification (adult weight >45 kg). These four groups contain 755 puppies. They are the same data shown above, enlarged for comparison.
Read the four-breed data table
Four breeds classified as giant in this study
BreedPuppies (n)Q1 (g)Median (g)Q3 (g)
Rottweiler111370410447.5
Bernese Mountain dog265445480555
Leonberger216450520581.25
Newfoundland163570640688

A small reading skill, a big difference

The middle half isn’t the healthy half.

A median puts the ordered observations in the middle: half lie at or below it and half at or above it. The first and third quartiles—Q1 and Q3—mark the edges of the middle half. Together they describe a distribution. They don’t sort puppies into “fine” and “needs help.”

That distinction is easy to lose when a table gets passed around without its methods. Calling an interquartile band a “normal range” changes its meaning. It also hides the observations on either side.

Keep this beside a research chart

Three things a birthweight chart can mean

Lower
quarter
Middle
quarter
Middle
quarter
Upper
quarter
Q1MedianQ3

A schematic of rank, not a weight axis. Tied values can sit on the boundaries.

Median
Where the middle observation sits. It isn’t a target for every puppy.
Interquartile range
Q1 to Q3: the middle half of this sample. It isn’t the smallest-to-largest span.
Clinical assessment
A different question: how is this puppy doing? A chart of quartiles can’t answer it.
The yellow Labrador mother rests with her five small closed-eye puppies gathered against her on the same blue fleece.
Look at the puppy and the mother as well as the number.

Put the evidence to work

Bring a better question, not a verdict.

Breed is part of the explanation, not the whole explanation. An Italian census of 3,293 puppies examined maternal size, body weight and body shape as well as litter size and sex. Birthweight was associated with several maternal characteristics. That doesn’t tell you why one particular puppy is small. Groppetti et al., 2017 ↗

Later French research followed both birthweight and growth during the first week. It used five separate growth intervals and survival to two months; its growth analyses didn’t all contain the same number of puppies. A starting weight and a later change are different observations. Keep the dates and age interval attached when you discuss them. Mugnier et al., 2023 ↗

When you talk to your veterinarian, bring the actual weight, unit, observation time, puppy identity and subsequent readings, along with what you’ve noticed about the puppy and mother. Ask which comparisons are appropriate for this litter and how the weight fits the wider assessment. If you’re concerned about a newborn, contact your veterinarian rather than waiting for a chart to settle the question.

The breeder sits beside the nursery reviewing handwritten notes, with a lined scale on a nearby low work surface.
Keep the reading and its context together.

Follow the evidence

Sources & a little more depth

The figures are original plots of published summaries. No individual observations have been reconstructed from the quartiles.

  1. Mugnier et al. · 2019
    Birth weight as a risk factor for neonatal mortality: Breed-specific approach to identify at-risk puppies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 171, 104746. Table 1 supplies the plotted weights; Table 2 supplies size groups. Methods §§2.1–2.2 and Results §3.1 describe the population. Mortality was followed to Day 21; the quartile bands shown here are descriptive.
  2. Groppetti et al. · 2017
    A National Census of Birth Weight in Purebred Dogs in Italy. Animals 7, 43. Italian voluntary census, 99 breeds; useful context for maternal differences. Institutional abstract and indexed Methods consulted; no values from its tables are plotted here.
  3. Mugnier et al. · 2023
    Relative Impact of Birth Weight and Early Growth on Neonatal Mortality in Puppies. Animals 13(12), 1928. Methods §§2.1–2.3; Table 1. 8,550 puppies, 24 breeds, 127 French kennels. Voluntary records and variable available growth data limit generalization.
  4. Read further · Chastant, 2026
    Developmental programming in dogs. Biology of Reproduction 115, 379–387. A narrative review of early-life influences and remaining research questions; it does not validate these quartiles as clinical boundaries.

Finished reading?

Keep track of the guides you’ve explored.